PortfoliosLab logo
AFL vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between AFL and ^GSPC is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

AFL vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aflac Incorporated (AFL) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AFL:

1.12

^GSPC:

0.65

Sortino Ratio

AFL:

1.55

^GSPC:

1.05

Omega Ratio

AFL:

1.24

^GSPC:

1.15

Calmar Ratio

AFL:

2.04

^GSPC:

0.68

Martin Ratio

AFL:

4.63

^GSPC:

2.61

Ulcer Index

AFL:

5.52%

^GSPC:

4.94%

Daily Std Dev

AFL:

22.37%

^GSPC:

19.64%

Max Drawdown

AFL:

-82.71%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

AFL:

-7.95%

^GSPC:

-4.19%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFL achieves a 2.11% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 0.08% return. Over the past 10 years, AFL has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 15.43%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.77% annualized return.


AFL

YTD

2.11%

1M

-1.68%

6M

-4.12%

1Y

24.86%

5Y*

29.50%

10Y*

15.43%

^GSPC

YTD

0.08%

1M

9.75%

6M

-1.63%

1Y

12.74%

5Y*

15.66%

10Y*

10.77%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AFL vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AFL is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AFL is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AFL is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AFL is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AFL is 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AFL is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 7777
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AFL vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aflac Incorporated (AFL) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AFL Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFL and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

AFL vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFL drawdown since its inception was -82.71%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFL and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

AFL vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Aflac Incorporated (AFL) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 6.15%. This indicates that AFL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...